3 Hunterdon towns oppose huge truck depot proposed in Franklin Twp.
By Gene Robbins/Hunterdon County Democrat
February 11, 2010, 3:04AM
FRANKLIN
TWP. -- Governing bodies in Hampton and Bethlehem and Union townships have approved strong resolutions opposing the proposed
truck warehouse/depot across the Musconetcong River in Warren County’s Franklin.
F. Greek Co. of East Brunswick has submitted a plan to build 1.44 million square feet of buildings and cover 3 million square feet of land on 192 farmland acres along rural Bloomsbury Road. The project would be used by truckers hauling cargo to and from the ports in Newark and Elizabeth.
The Union Township Committee resolution, adopted Feb. 3, noted that truck terminal “flies in the face” of millions of dollars of investment in farm and open space preservation by the county and municipal government in an attempt to restrain development.
Bethlehem Township’s resolution came Feb. 4 after the committee heard from many of the 25 people who came to the regularly scheduled meeting. The resolution says the project would “have a devastating impact on the natural resources, public safety and general welfare of Bethlehem Township.”
The application estimates at least 700 trucks a day and 2,000
car-vehicle trips per day, much of which would come off Route 78 at exits 6 and 7 — or farther east in Union Township
on Route 173 — and pass through Bethlehem and Bloomsbury.
The project would be a $55 million ratable in a municipality
with a tax base of $417 million. It would lie across the river in the area of Bethlehem’s only multi-use park and sports
fields.
Union Township’s resolution said it “strenuously objects” to the truck terminal due to the regional traffic impact, and called upon the Franklin Township government body to amend its zoning to avoid such potential adverse impacts.
Hampton could see a jump in heavy rig traffic if truckers aren’t prevented from traveling between the depot and Route 31 along Route 632 to avoid Route 78. But Environmental Commission Chairman Robert Sheridan told Council Monday night that, other than an occasional “lost” truck, the impact there would be from many of the expected “hundreds” of local depot employees who would travel Hampton’s back roads to avoid the interstate.
Franklin’s Land Use Board held its first public hearing on the project the same night as Union’s governing body met. More than 300 people, including all five Bethlehem Township Committee members, attended.
Bethlehem Township Committee members said they are talking to neighboring municipalities about the possibility of a shared-services agreement to hire a planner to analyze the plan critically, said Mayor Greg Glazar.
Bethlehem’s resolution says the depot would conflict with a section of Franklin’s own land use laws “to guide development in a manner… that does not conflict with the development and general welfare of neighboring municipalities, the county and state as a whole.”
The
Bethlehem Township Board of Education, citing concerns for school bus safety and the health of children in the park, has approved
a resolution opposing the truck depot.
Bethlehem Township Attorney Michael Butler said the township didn’t have
any direct jurisdiction over the application, but could raise questions and make its opinion known.
Township resident
Stephen Trapp, a civil engineer, said the depot would have an impact on the township even before the first tractor-trailer
rolls in.
“The construction process itself would be nothing short of massive,” he said. He said building the road, six warehouse buildings and drainage ponds would require cuts in the slope of up to 20 feet, and fills of 20 to 30 feet. He estimated it would take 100 trucks coming and going every day for a year to bring in necessary fill.
Disturbing so much soil could alter the subsurface flow of water and affect wells even off the site, he said.
Resident John Chester said the project could “transform our valley forever.”
Beth Styler Barry, director of Musconetcong Watershed Association, said
the projected 3 million square feet of impervious surface could warm the river and harm fish and wildlife.
“If
you change the temperature (of the river) by one degree, you are degrading the stream,” she said. Federal and state
protections make that illegal, she said.
While there was applause and smiles from the audience after the resolution was
read, officials warned that opposition will have to be sustained, perhaps for years.
“Expect a long haul,” said Committeeman John Meehan. You can’t go away.

